The County Championship injury replacement trial has come under more scrutiny, after Lancashire's substitute seamer was reportedly deemed 'too good' to replace injured Ajeet Singh Dale.
Right-arm seamer Ajeet Singh Dale went down injured early on day one of Lancashire's match against Gloucestershire in Bristol on Friday (April 17). Under the ECB's injury substitute trial, players can be replaced by a like-for-like player in the case of injury at any point in the match. Whether a player is a like-for-like replacement must be signed off by the match referee.
Lancashire had two other seam bowlers in their squad who hadn't made the playing XI. Mitchell Stanley was one, although a back spasm reportedly ruled him out of action. The other, Tom Bailey, is a right-arm seamer, and in role could be considered like-for-like for Singh Dale. However, Lancashire CCC CEO Daniel Gidney revealed in a social media post that Bailey was deemed 'too good a bowler' to replace Singh Dale.
Bailey has played 125 first-class fixtures, including the first two matches of Lancashire's 2026 County Championship campaign, across which he took nine wickets. Singh Dale moved to Lancashire over the winter, having taken 40 wickets for Gloucestershire last season.
Once Bailey was deemed not to be a like-for-like replacement, Lancashire called up Ollie Sutton, who has one first-class cap to his name, and was playing in a second XI game in Leicestershire.
What do the rules say about like-for-like replacements?
The ECB's Replacement Player Regulations state: "The Match Referee will make the final determination on whether to approve the nominated player as a Replacement Player, and any conditions that must apply. The Match Referee's decision is final, and there will be no right of appeal."
On what constitutes 'like-for-like', the regulations say: "The Replacement Player must be 'like-for-like (or sufficiently close to like-for-like). Specifically, the type of player should match the role of the Affected Player."
There is no specific provision in the regulations for the quality of a replacement player.
What controversy has there already been over the injury replacement trial?
The substitute trial began at the start of the 2026 season, but has already come under significant scrutiny. In the last round of fixtures, Glamorgan head coach Kiran Carson expressed his frustration with the trial after his side lost to Nottinghamshire. Notts were able to replace Fergus O'Neill with Lyndon James on the final day of the match, with James taking two wickets on fresh legs.
"This is no slight on Notts whatsoever, because we would have done the exact same thing if we were in that position," said Carlson. "But to bring in a guy who hadn't played cricket for three days to then come in and bowl, obviously that's an advantage."
Sky Sports pundit and former England batter, Ian Ward, described the trial as "complete nonsense" after Yorkshire replaced Jhye Richardson with Logan van Beek. Given that Yorkshire have a bye in the current round of fixtures, Richardson's availability for the next one of his contracted Championship appearances would not be affected by the mandatory 'stand-down' period following a substitution.
Hampshire coach Russell Domingo jokingly said in response to Richardson's replacement that he could give his players laxatives if they were bowling badly in order to bring in a replacement.
Also read: County Championship injury replacement trial: Full list of players subbed in and out so far
The trial rules also came into effect at Chelmsford, when Somerset overlooked Archie Vaughan, who had travelled as part of their squad for the fixture against Essex, instead opting for Will Smeed to replace Tom Kohler-Cadmore after the latter injured his thumb early in the game. Smeed had to travel from Wales, where he too was playing a second XI game, and had scored two hundreds, to take up his place. Vaughan was later used as an injury sub for Lewis Goldsworthy.
The ECB substitute rules are markedly more relaxed than similar trials in Australia and India. In trials during the Sheffield Shield, players were only allowed to be replaced on the first two days of a match. Under the ECB's rules, players may be replaced at any time in the game. The stand-down period for a substituted player following an incident is also eight days under ECB rules, compared to 12 in Australia.
Writing in The Times earlier this week, former England captain Michael Atherton said that the rules "needed tightening".
Follow Wisden for all cricket updates, including live scores, match stats, quizzes and more. Stay up to date with the latest cricket news, player updates, team standings, match highlights, video analysis and live match odds.
